Do you find geocentrism easier to defend than young-earth creationism?

Yes, I would say yes to that, for the exact reasons the viewer gives. When you first hear of geocentrism it sounds like a conspiracy theory, but over time you realize all the evidence for it has already been placed there for us by the top scientists; it is just a matter of someone being crazy enough to put geocentrism into practice, because your reputation will be shot for a while and they will think you are crazy. Albert Einstein is the one who allows us to have the geocentric universe, whereas Newton would not, because Newton's vision of physics was limited and it took Einstein to bring us to the next level. Einstein invented special relativity precisely to keep the earth out of the center, and then when he had to invent general relativity, it put the earth right back in the center, to his own consternation. Physics professors and astrophysicists will confirm this when pressed, but you would get no such confirmation from a biology professor on the age of the earth, because biologists are the worst. So yes, geocentrism is easier to defend, because it defends the Church, the Bible, the history, and the tradition all lumped together, and every time I debate it, people come in thinking they are debating a flat-earther and wind up knocked off their feet.