What do you think of the archaeological finds of Ronald Wyatt?

I saw them many years ago and was impressed at the time, but again it is all presented Hollywood-style, edited to include only what seems convincing, like the account of blood dripping down into caverns beneath the crucifixion site. It could be true or not; I have no way to verify it. The same goes for the ark: some claim to have found actual pieces of the boat thousands of years later, while others say no wood would remain and you could only see the frame in the ground, which may be what he was seeing. That is the real problem with all the ark and related discoveries: everyone has a different story, and at most only one can be right, but you have no way to judge between them. So his evidence stays at the level of interesting and possible without being provable. That said, I would not call him a fraud or a huckster; I have watched him long enough to think he has a good heart and genuinely wants to find the truth.