Why do scientists refuse to debate you on geocentrism?
Robert Sungenis says that in twenty-three years he has asked at least a dozen PhD physicists to debate geocentrism and been refused. He reports that most who declined admitted there was no use debating, because modern physics supports geocentric cosmology and they would be left conceding his position while saying only that they prefer a heliocentric one.
A viewer asks why scientists dodge Robert and whether he has tried to debate them on geocentrism.
Answer
I have been at this for twenty-three years and have asked at least a dozen PhD physicists to debate. Some will not debate because they just want to be snarky and not give me the time of day. Most who declined admitted there is no use debating, because they know modern physics supports geocentric cosmology; they know I would win, and they do not want to be in a debate where they concede the opponent's position and are left saying they simply prefer a heliocentric system. To them that would be equivalent to admitting geocentric cosmology is correct, so they will not do it. Then you have the outliers who have no real training in classical or modern physics but think they can handle it, and when they try, they cannot. So the debating side of geocentric cosmology has not been an easy road.